0.10/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1440 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 180 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 06:24:54 EDT 2024 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.20/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZrNxBCIXiP/E---3.1_26529.p 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.49 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 26682 completed with status 0 0.20/0.49 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied 0.20/0.49 # Search class: HHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.20/0.49 # new_ho_10 with pid 26687 completed with status 0 0.20/0.49 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied 0.20/0.49 # Search class: HHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.20/0.49 0.20/0.49 # Proof found! 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Theorem 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.20/0.49 thf(decl_22, type, nt: $i > $i). 0.20/0.49 thf(decl_23, type, imp: $i > $i > $i). 0.20/0.49 thf(decl_24, type, cT: $i > $o). 0.20/0.49 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.20/0.49 thf(cLCL077_1, conjecture, ~(((((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X1))))&?[X3:$i]:(~((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ X3)) @ X3)))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ (imp @ X2 @ X1)))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i, X4:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X4)) @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X2) @ (imp @ X1 @ X4))))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2)))|(cT @ X2)|~((cT @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZrNxBCIXiP/E---3.1_26529.p', cLCL077_1)). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(~(((((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X1))))&?[X3:$i]:(~(cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ X3)) @ X3))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ (imp @ X2 @ X1)))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i, X4:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X4)) @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X2) @ (imp @ X1 @ X4))))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((~(cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|(cT @ X2)|~(cT @ X1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cLCL077_1])])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X15:$i, X16:$i, X18:$i, X19:$i, X20:$i, X21:$i, X22:$i, X23:$i, X24:$i]:((((((cT @ (imp @ X15 @ (imp @ X16 @ X15)))&~(cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ esk1_0)) @ esk1_0)))&(cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X18) @ (nt @ X19)) @ (imp @ X19 @ X18))))&(cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X20 @ (imp @ X21 @ X22)) @ (imp @ (imp @ X20 @ X21) @ (imp @ X20 @ X22)))))&(~(cT @ (imp @ X23 @ X24))|(cT @ X24)|~(cT @ X23)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:(((cT @ X2)|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2)))|~((cT @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X3)) @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X2) @ (imp @ X1 @ X3))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X2) @ (imp @ X1 @ X3)))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X3)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X3 @ X2))))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_5])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|~((cT @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_6])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X3)))|~((cT @ (imp @ X3 @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ (imp @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X3 @ X1) @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_6])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ X3))|~((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X2 @ X1) @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ X1))|~((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_10])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X3) @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ X1))|~((cT @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_8])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ X1)) @ X1))|~((cT @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ esk1_0)) @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ X1)) @ X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_10])). 0.20/0.49 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])]), ['proof']). 0.20/0.49 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 4 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 8 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 62 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 15 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 47 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 3 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 175 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 155 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 175 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.20/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 11 0.20/0.49 # ...of those cached : 5 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 39 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 30 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 98 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 220 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 8 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 197 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 197 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 26 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 3 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 62 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 2 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2937 0.20/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 100 0.20/0.49 0.20/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.007 s 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.010 s 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages 0.20/0.49 0.20/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.007 s 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.014 s 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting 0.20/0.49 % E exiting 0.20/0.49 EOF